Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 02:24
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Why prices from these cities in Utah and Nebraska won't be included in inflation data - NPR
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
When AI takes all jobs how will the lowest class make money to survive?
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
When was the first time you suck on a penis?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Netflix’s Buzzy New Doc About an Infamous Tragedy Shows It’s Just the Beginning - Slate Magazine
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear: